Why is CAEP Accreditation important?
The University of Tennessee at Martin’s Educator Preparation Program (EPP) is accredited by Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP). CAEP’s mission is to advance equity and excellence in educator preparation through evidence-based accreditation that assures quality and supports continuous improvement to strengthen P-12 student learning. CAEP is the only national accreditor for educator preparation programs that has been recognized by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation since it began.
State Approved & CAEP Accredited Licensure Programs
The College of Education, Health and Behavioral Sciences at the University of Tennessee at Martin was granted full accreditation of all educator licensure programs at the initial-licensure level in April 2018 from the Accreditation Council of the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP). Advanced programs were not under consideration during the April 2018 visit. All programs will be reviewed during the next CAEP Site Review held in Fall 2025. A current list of the nationally approved educator licensure programs can be found below.
CAEP Accreditation Educator Licensure Programs
The College of Education, Health and Behavioral Sciences at University of Tennessee at Martin was granted full accreditation of all educator licensure programs at the initial-licensure level in April 2018 from the Accreditation Council of the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP). Advanced programs were not under consideration during the April 2018 visit. All programs will be reviewed during the next CAEP Site Review held in Fall 2025. A current list of the nationally approved educator licensure programs is included below.
CAEP Accredited/State Approved Initial Licensure Programs
Early Childhood Education (phasing out August 2026)
PreK-3
Elementary Education
Elementary (K-5)
Middle Grades Content Areas
English/Language Arts, Math, Science, Social Studies (6-8)
Secondary Content Areas
Agriculture Education, Biology, Business, Chemistry, Earth & Space, Economics, English, Family and Consumer Sciences, French, Geography, Government, History, Math, Spanish (6-12)
Specialized Subject Areas
Art, Dance, Health and Human Performance, Music (K-12)
Special Education
SPED Interventionist (K-8), SPED Interventionist English, SPED Interventionist Math, SPED Interventionist Science, SPED Interventionist Social Studies (6-12)
Master of Science in Education in Initial Licensure*
Elementary (K-5), Secondary- Biology, Business, Chemistry, Earth & Space, Economics, English, French, Geography, Government, History, Math, Spanish (6-12), Special Education Interventionist (K-8)
Integrated Early Childhood/SPED
PreK-3 & SPED
State Approved Advanced Licensure Programs*
Instructional Leadership
Master of Science in Education in Instructional Leadership
School Counseling
Master of Science in Education with a Major in School Counseling
*State Approved programs will undergo CAEP review during the next scheduled CAEP visit.
CAEP Accountability Measures
UT Martin’s Educator Preparation Program prepares and reports on educators for initial and advanced state licensure. CAEP has identified Accountability Measures upon which the EPP must report and make data publicly available on an annual basis. The information will include the four CAEP Accountability Measures of (a) completer impact and effectiveness, (b) employer satisfaction and stakeholder involvement, (c) candidate competency at the time of program completion, and (d) ability of completers to be hired in positions for which they were prepared. UT Martin’s Educator Preparation Program is committed to reporting evidence of accountability through a presentation of assessment and consumer data to all partners and constituents in a transparent and timely manner. The process involved in the reporting of these measures allows us to continually reflect and implement changes to better prepare teacher candidates and ensure quality in educator preparation. Please see the annual reporting measures listed below.
Impact Measures
Measure 1 (Initial) Completer effectiveness and Impact on P-12 learning and development
(Component R4.1)
Measure 2. (Initial and/or Advanced). Satisfaction of employers and stakeholder involvement
(Components R4.2 | R5.3 | RA.4.1)
Outcome Measures
Measure 3 (Initial and/or Advanced). Candidate competency at program completion
(Component R3.3 | RA3.4)
Measure 4 (Initial and/or Advanced). Ability of completers to be hired in education positions for which they have prepared
Initial Programs Accountability Measures
CAEP Accountability Measures for EPP Initial Licensure Programs:
PreK-3, Elementary (K-5), Integrated Early Childhood/SPED, Middle Grades 6-8 (English/Language Arts, Math, Science, Social Studies), Secondary Education 6-12 (Agriculture Education, Biology, Business, Chemistry, Earth & Space, Economics, English, Family and Consumer Sciences, French, Geography, Government, History, Math, Spanish), Specialized Subject Areas K-12 (Art, Dance, Health and Human Performance, Music), Special Education (SPED Interventionist (K-8), SPED Interventionist English, SPED Interventionist Math, SPED Interventionist Science, SPED Interventionist Social Studies (6-12), Master of Science in Education in Initial Licensure (Elementary (K-5), Secondary- Biology, Business, Chemistry, Earth & Space, Economics, English, French, Geography, Government, History, Math, Spanish (6-12), Special Education Interventionist (K-8)).
Measure 1: Completer Impact and Effectiveness
To address Measure 1, Completer Impact and Effectiveness, UTM EPP analyzes data from the Tennessee Department of Education Annual Reports, TVAAS scores, UT Martin’s Educator Preparation Program Report Card, Candidate Exit Surveys and Alumni Surveys. These surveys are distributed annually. The completer and alumni respond to statements indicating their level of satisfaction with the preparation received from the EPP. UTM EPP also reviews the results from the TDOE Educator Survey. The Tennessee Educator Survey is a voluntary and confidential survey, open to all teachers, administrators, and other certified staff across the state. The survey is meant to provide direct feedback to administrators and policymakers on a series of key issues facing our schools and classrooms.
Impact on P-12 Learning and Indicators of Teaching Effectiveness
TN Department of Education Annual Reports
- 2023 TN Department of Education Annual Report (2021-22)
- 2022 TN Department of Education Annual Report (2020-2021)
- 2021 TN Department of Education Annual Report (2019-2020)
- 2020 State Collaborative on Reforming Education Statement Regarding the Teacher Preparation During the Pandemic
- 2020 TN Department of Education Annual Report (2018-2019)
- 2019 TN Department of Education Annual Report (2017-2018)
TVAAS
The Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) measures the impact schools and teachers have on their students' academic progress. TVAAS is a powerful tool because it measures how much students grow in a year and shines more light on student progress than solely considering their score on an end of year test. TVAAS allows educators to consider their students’ achievement (their score on the end of year assessment), as well as their growth (the progress students make year to year).1 Performance benchmarks were set based on three-year averages (not including the current year).
- 2023 TVAAS Results
- 2022 TVAAS Results
- 2021 TVAAS Results
- 2020 TVAAS Results
Due to the COVID-19 public health emergency and related school closures, no teacher evaluation data is available from the 2019-20 school year. - 2019 TVAAS Breakdown
1 Published by https://team-tn.org/tvaas/
UTM EPP Report Card
“Teachers impact every other profession in our state by developing people — equipping students with the critical knowledge, tools, and skills they need to succeed in post-secondary education, careers, and beyond. The knowledge and skills taught in educator preparation programs are vital to ensuring every student in Tennessee has a well-prepared teacher from Day 1 in the classroom. The Report Card uses multiple metrics to provide information about teacher and leader preparation in the state to shine a spotlight on each provider's strengths and areas to continue to grow.
In 2007, the Tennessee General Assembly passed legislation requiring the publication of a report on key metrics of educator preparation providers throughout the state. Several aspects of the report card are required by that legislation, including indicators: placement and retention rates, scores on licensure exams, and teacher effect data based on Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) scores. The report card also includes other key priority areas for the State Board. This information can help providers make program improvements and provide the public with information on important aspects of educator preparation in the state.”
- UTM EPP State Report Card 2023
- UTM EPP State Report Card 2022
- UTM EPP State Report Card 2021
- UTM EPP State Report Card 2020
- UTM EPP State Report Card 2019
- UTM EPP State Report Card 2018
Satisfaction of Completers
Satisfaction Section of the Report Card
- 2023 Satisfaction Section of the Report Card
- 2022 Satisfaction Section of the Report Card
- 2021 Satisfaction Section of the Report Card
TDOE Educator Survey
TERA Trends from the Tennessee Educator Survey
Measure 2: Satisfaction of employers and stakeholder involvement
To address Measure 2, satisfaction of employers and stakeholder involvement, UTM EPP analyzes data from satisfaction of employers surveys, Provider Impact section of the EPP Report card, retention of completers for 3 years, state-recognized partnerships, and feedback from our LEAs.
Satisfaction of Employers and Employment Milestones
Satisfaction of Employers
- 2023 Employer Satisfaction/Provider Impact
- 2022 Employer Satisfaction/Provider Impact
- 2021 Employer Satisfaction/Provider Impact
- 2020 Employer Satisfaction Results
- 2019 Employer Satisfaction Survey
- 2018 Employer Satisfaction Survey
- 2017 Employer Satisfaction Survey
Location of Graduates Working
- 2023 Location of graduates working
- 2022 Location of graduates working
- 2021 Location of graduates working
Employment-First Year Employment, Second Year Retention, and Third Year Retention
- 2023 Employment-First Year Employment, Second Year Retention, and Third Year Retention
- 2022 Employment-First Year Employment, Second Year Retention, and Third Year Retention
- 2021 Employment-First Year Employment, Second Year Retention, and Third Year Retention
- 2020 Employment-First Year Employment, Second Year Retention, and Third Year Retention
Stakeholder Involvement
State-Recognized Partnerships
Primary Partnership School Districts
- Instructional Leadership partnership - Coming Soon
- Weakley County Schools
Secondary Partnership School Districts
2024-25
- Alamo City School
- Anderson County
- Bartlett City Schools
- Bedford County
- Bells City School District
- Benton County
- Blount County
- Bradford SSD
- Bradley County
- Campbell County
- Cannon County
- Cheatham County
- Chester County
- Claiborne County
- Clay County
- Cleveland City Schools
- Cocke County
- Coffee County
- Collierville Schools
- Crockett County
- Cumberland County
- Decatur County
- Dickson County
- Dyer County
- Dyersburg City Schools
- Fayette County Public Schools
- Fayetteville City Schools
- Fentress County
- Franklin County
- Germantown Municipal School District
- Gibson County SSD
- Giles County
- Greenville City Schools
- Hamilton County
- Hardeman County
- Hardin County
- Haywood County
- Henderson County
- Henry County
- Hickman County
- Hollow Rock Bruceton SSD
- Houston County
- Humboldt City Schools
- Humphreys County
- Huntingdon SSD
- Jackson Christian School
- Jackson County
- Jackson-Madison County
- Johnson City
- Johnson County
- Lake County
- Lakeland Schools
- Lauderdale County
- Lawrence County
- Lexington City Schools
- Lincoln County
- Loudon County
- Macon County
- Marshall County
- Maury County
- McKenzie SSD
- McMinn County Schools
- McNairy County
- Metro Nashville Public Schools
- Milan SSD
- Millington Municipal Schools
- Moore County
- Morgan County
- Obion County
- Oneida Special School District
- Paris SSD
- Perry County
- Putnam County
- Roane County
- Robertson County
- Rutherford County
- Smith County
- South Carroll
- Stewart County
- Sumner County
- Sullivan County
- Tipton County
- Trenton SSD
- Tullahoma Schools
- Union City Schools
- Warren County
- Wayne Academy
- Wayne County
- West Carroll SSD
- Williamson County
- Wilson County
Prior years’ Secondary Partnership School Districts agreements are on file in the UT Martin Educator Preparation Program office.
Feedback from LEAs
- UTM EPP worked with LEAs to complete a specialty area proposal that was submitted to the TN Department of Education for an integrated preK-3 special education program.
- The Integrated Early Childhood/SPED program has been conditionally approved by the TDOE and will be offered effective Fall 2024.
- Spring 2023 & Summer 2023: Collaborated with LEAs to identify current teachers in the field interested in pursuing additional endorsements in special education and ESL.
- 154 completed the ESL endorsement.
- 20 completed the SPED endorsement.
- Grow Your Own apprenticeship grant- held multiple meetings with stakeholders to launch this program
- o UTM secured 13 Grow Your Own district partnerships and all districts were TN Department of Education and TN Department of Labor apprenticeship programs based on district needs assessment.
- Cohort 1 consisted of 20 graduate students and 14 undergraduate students pursing degrees in Elementary Education K-5 w/ ESL & SPED add-on’s, SPED K-8, or Secondary English.
- Cohort 2 began in August 2023 as a post-baccalaureate licensure only pathway. The cohort selected 17 participants that will complete requirements by summer 2024.
- Grow Your Own Presentation
Measure 3: Candidate Competency at Program Completion
To address Measure 3, UTM EPP reports annually on student outcomes such as graduation rates, retention rates, and completer/appeals data for initial and advanced licensure programs. UTM EPP also tracks Praxis pass rates and Title II data to monitor the ability of completers to meet licensure requirements.
Graduation Rates
Completer and Appeals Data
UTM EPP monitors completer and appeals data. Completer data also provides UTM predictive analysis for what is to come on Domain 1 TDOE Annual Reports and TN Report Card Candidate Profile.
- 2019-2023 Completer/Appeals Data
- 2019-2022 Completer/Appeals Data
- 2018-2021 Completer/Appeals Data
- 2017-2020 Completer/Appeals Data
Graduation and Retention Rates
UTM EPP reports graduation and retention rates annually.
- 2022-23 Six-Year Graduate and Retention Rates
- 2021-2022 Six-Year Graduation and Retention Rates
- 2020-2021 Six-Year Graduation and Retention Rates
- 2019-2020 Six-Year Graduation and Retention Rates
- 2018-19 Six-Year Graduation and Retention Rates
Ability of Completers to Meet Licensing (Certification) and Any Additional State Requirements; Title II
Candidate Assessment-UTM Report Card
- 2023 Candidate Assessment
- EPP Plan of Action to Improve Performance
- 2022 Candidate Assessment
- 2021 Candidate Assessment
- 2020 Candidate Assessment
Praxis Pass Rates
To be considered as a completer with UTM’s EPP and be considered for licensure, candidates must pass state-mandated content and pedagogy tests (Praxis tests) for their licensure area. The Praxis exams are administered through Pearson Assessments. Results are monitored and reported annually for the university and compared to state results. Institutional pass rates are generated by the Title II report and are calculated based on Tennessee’s Cutscores.
- 2022-23 Alternative
- 2022-23 Traditional
- 2021-22 Alternative
- 2021-22 Traditional
- 2020-21 Alternative
- 2020-21 Traditional
- 2019-20 Alternative
- 2019-20 Traditional
- 2018-19 Alternative
- 2018-19 Traditional
Title II Reports
In accordance with state and federal law, Educator Preparation Programs are required to annually collect and report on specific information from initial licensure programs. Information includes, but not limited to, admission requirements, number of enrolled candidates, number of program completers, race and ethnicity statistics, clinical experiences, number of candidates prepared in the various subjects, assessment pass rate data, etc.
2024 Reports
- Title II Report (AY 2022-23) - Traditional Program
- Title II Report (AY 2022-23) - Alternative Program
2023 Reports
- Title II Report (AY 2021-22) - Traditional Program
- Title II Report (AY 2021-22) - Alternative Program
2022 Reports
- Title II Report (AY 2020-21) - Traditional Program
- Title II Report (AY 2020-21) - Alternative Program
2021 Reports
- Title II Report (AY 2019-20) - Traditional Program
- Title II Report (AY 2019-20) - Alternative Program
2019-20 Reports
- Available in EPP Office upon request
2018-19 Reports
- Available in EPP Office upon request
Measure 4: Ability of Candidates to be Hired in Education Positions for Which They Have Been Prepared
To address Measure 4, Ability of Completers to be Hired in Education Positions for which They Have Prepared, UTM EPP analyzes data from the Tennessee Department of Education Annual Reports, UT Martin’s Educator Preparation Program Report Card, job placement surveys, and memos from SCORE.
TN Department of Education Annual Reports
- 2021 TN Department of Education Annual Report (2019-2020)
- 2020 State Collaborative on Reforming Education Statement Regarding the Teacher Preparation During the Pandemic
- 2020 TN Department of Education Annual Report (2018-2019)
- 2019 TN Department of Education Annual Report (2017-2018)
LEA Teacher Vacancy Data
UTM EPP Report Card
- UTM EPP State Report Card 2023
- UTM EPP State Report Card 2022
- UTM EPP State Report Card 2021
- UTM EPP State Report Card 2020
- UTM EPP State Report Card 2019
- UTM EPP State Report Card 2018
Job Placement Survey and Employment Domain from UTM EPP Report Card
Job Placement Survey
- 2022-23 Job Placement Survey
- 2021-2022 Job Placement Survey
- 2020-2021 Job Placement Survey
- 2019-2020 Job Placement Survey
Employment Domain from the UTM EPP Report Card
Other Completer Data
Student Loan Default Rates and Other Consumer Information (Initial and Advanced Levels)
The Office of Federal Student Aid, under the direction of the US Department of Education, publishes official Federal Cohort Default Rates once per year. A cohort default rate is the percentage of a school’s borrowers who enter repayment on certain Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) Program or Direct Loan Program loans during a particular federal fiscal year, October 1 to September 30, and default or meet other specified conditions prior to the end of the second following fiscal year.
- For 2020, 2021, and 2002 the Official Cohort Default Rate was 0.0%. NOTE: Students were not in repayment during this time period.
*Published September of 2023. Contact our Financial Aid Office for a copy of the official letter. - For 2019, 2020, and 2021 the Official Cohort Default Rate was 2.2%.
*Contact our Financial Aid Office for a copy of the official letter. - 2019 Official Cohort Default Rate was 2.2%.
*Published September 2022. Contact our Financial Aid Office for a copy of the official letter. - 2018 Official Cohort Default Rate was 6.7%.
*Published September 2021. Contact our Financial Aid Office for a copy of the official letter. - 2017 Official Cohort Default Rate was 8.6%.
*Published September 2020. Contact our Financial Aid Office for a copy of the official letter. - 2016 Official Cohort Default Rate was 8.4%.
*Published September 2019. Contact our Financial Aid Office for a copy of the official letter.
Advanced Accountability Measures
CAEP Accountability Measures for EPP Advanced Licensure Programs:
Instructional Leadership (Master of Science in Education in Instructional Leadership) and School Counseling (Master of Science in Education with a Major in School Counseling).
Measure 1: Completer Impact and Effectiveness
To address Measure 1, Completer Impact and Effectiveness, UTM EPP analyzes data from assessment of students completed by university supervisors and external mentors as well as completer satisfaction surveys.
Impact on P-12 Learning and Indicators of Teaching Effectiveness
School Counseling Student Learning Outcomes
- 2022-23 School Counseling Student Learning Outcomes
- 2021-22 School Counseling Student Learning Outcomes
- 2021 Classroom Observations documented by university supervisors and cooperating teachers serve as another source of evidence of teaching effectiveness.
Instructional Leadership Student Learning Outcomes
- 2022-23 Instructional Leadership Student Learning Outcomes
- 2021-22 Instructional Leadership Student Learning Outcomes
Peer Review Survey
Exit Surveys
Satisfaction of Completers
- 2023 Tennessee Educator Survey-Educational Leaders/Administrators Feedback
- 2022 Tennessee Educator Survey-Educational Leaders/Administrators Feedback
- 2021 Tennessee Educator Survey-Educational Leaders/Administrators Feedback
Other Surveys and Reports
Measure 2: Satisfaction of employers and stakeholder involvement
To address Measure 2, satisfaction of employers and stakeholder involvement, UTM EPP analyzes data from employer satisfaction surveys and survey results from our LEAs.
Satisfaction of Employers and Employment Milestones
Stakeholder Involvement
Advisory Board Meetings
LEAs MOU Survey Results
Employment Outcomes
Measure 3: Candidate Competency at Program Completion
To address Measure 3, UTM EPP reports annually on graduation and retention rates, student learning outcomes, Praxis pass rates, and Title II reports.
Graduation Rates and Retention Rates
UTM EPP reports graduation and retention rates annually.
- Fall 2023-Advanced Programs Enrollment by Term
- Fall 2022-Advanced Programs Enrollment by Term
- Fall 2021-Advanced Programs Enrollment by Term
- Fall 22-Spring 2023 Advanced Programs Graduation Rates
- Fall 21-Spring 2022 Advanced Programs Graduation Rates
- Fall 20-Spring 2021 Advanced Programs Graduation Rates
Student Learning Outcomes
School Counseling
- 2023 School Counseling Student Learning Outcomes
- 2022 School Counseling Student Learning Outcomes
- 2021 Counseling Student Learning Outcomes
Instructional Leadership Student Learning Outcomes
- 2023 Instructional Leadership Student Learning Outcomes
- 2022 Instructional Leadership Student Learning Outcomes
- 2021 Instructional Leadership Student Learning Outcomes
Ability of Completers to Meet Licensing (Certification) and Any Additional State Requirements; Title II
Praxis Pass Rates
To be considered as a completer with UTM’s EPP and be considered for licensure, candidates must pass state-mandated content and pedagogy tests (Praxis tests) for their licensure area. The Praxis exams are administered through Pearson Assessments. Results are monitored and reported annually for the university and compared to state results. Institutional pass rates are generated by the Title II report and are calculated based on Tennessee’s Cutscores.
Instructional Leadership
- 2023 Instructional Leadership Licensure Pass Rate
- 2022 Instructional Leadership Licensure Pass Rate
- 2021 Instructional Leadership Licensure Pass Rate
School Counseling
Title II Reports
In accordance with state and federal law, Educator Preparation Programs are required to annually collect and report on specific information from initial licensure programs. Information includes, but not limited to, admission requirements, number of enrolled candidates, number of program completers, race and ethnicity statistics, clinical experiences, number of candidates prepared in the various subjects, assessment pass rate data, etc.
2024 Reports
- Title II Report (AY 2022-23) - Traditional Program
- Title II Report (AY 2022-23) - Alternative Program
2023 Reports
- Title II Report (AY 2021-22) - Traditional Program
- Title II Report (AY 2021-22) - Alternative Program
2022 Reports
- Title II Report (AY 2020-21) - Traditional Program
- Title II Report (AY 2020-21) - Alternative Program
2021 Reports
- Title II Report (AY 2019-20) - Traditional Program
- Title II Report (AY 2019-20) - Alternative Program
2019-20 Reports
- Available in EPP Office upon request
2018-19 Reports
- Available in EPP Office upon request
Measure 4: Ability of Candidates to be Hired in Education Positions for Which They Have Been Prepared
To address Measure 4, Ability of Completers to be Hired in Education Positions for which They Have Prepared, UTM EPP analyzes data from the Tennessee Department of Education Annual Reports, UT Martin’s Educator Preparation Program Report Card, job placement surveys, and memos from SCORE.
TN Department of Education Annual Reports
- 2021 TN Department of Education Annual Report (2019-2020)
- 2020 State Collaborative on Reforming Education Statement Regarding the Teacher Preparation During the Pandemic
- 2020 TN Department of Education Annual Report (2018-2019)
- 2019 TN Department of Education Annual Report (2017-2018)
LEA Teacher Vacancy Data
UTM EPP Report Card
- UTM EPP State Report Card 2023
- UTM EPP State Report Card 2022
- UTM EPP State Report Card 2021
- UTM EPP State Report Card 2020
- UTM EPP State Report Card 2019
- UTM EPP State Report Card 2018
Job Placement Survey and Employment Domain from UTM EPP Report Card
Job Placement Survey
- 2022-2023 Job Placement Survey
- 2021-2022 Job Placement Survey
- 2020-2021 Job Placement Survey
- 2019-2020 Job Placement Survey
Employment Domain from the UTM EPP Report Card
- 2022-2023 Employment Domain from UTM EPP Report Card
- 2021-2022 Employment Domain from UTM EPP Report Card
- 2020-2021 Employment Domain from UTM EPP Report Card
- 2019-2020 Employment Domain from UTM EPP Report Card
Employment Outcomes
Other Completer Data
Student Loan Default Rates and Other Consumer Information (Initial and Advanced Levels)
The Office of Federal Student Aid, under the direction of the US Department of Education, publishes official Federal Cohort Default Rates once per year. A cohort default rate is the percentage of a school’s borrowers who enter repayment on certain Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) Program or Direct Loan Program loans during a particular federal fiscal year, October 1 to September 30, and default or meet other specified conditions prior to the end of the second following fiscal year.
- For 2020, 2021, and 2002 the Official Cohort Default Rate was 0.0%. NOTE: Students were not in repayment during this time period.
*Published September of 2023. Contact our Financial Aid Office for a copy of the official letter. - For 2019, 2020, and 2021 the Official Cohort Default Rate was 2.2%.
*Contact our Financial Aid Office for a copy of the official letter. - 2019 Official Cohort Default Rate was 2.2%.
*Published September 2022. Contact our Financial Aid Office for a copy of the official letter. - 2018 Official Cohort Default Rate was 6.7%.
*Published September 2021. Contact our Financial Aid Office for a copy of the official letter. - 2017 Official Cohort Default Rate was 8.6%.
*Published September 2020. Contact our Financial Aid Office for a copy of the official letter. - 2016 Official Cohort Default Rate was 8.4%.
*Published September 2019. Contact our Financial Aid Office for a copy of the official letter.